Token Maxing Till Midnight
- Rich Washburn

- 9 hours ago
- 3 min read


It's Sunday, July 5th, the day after the 4th, and I have exactly until midnight to burn through almost a month's worth of vibe-coding tokens before they reset and vanish into the ether, because apparently rollover credits are a courtesy the phone companies figured out decades ago and half the SaaS world still hasn't caught up to. I'm writing this fast. I have things to build. Bear with me.
The Setup
One of my accounts runs on a use-it-or-lose-it token model. No rollover. You either burn what you've got by the reset window or you watch it disappear and start fresh at zero, having accomplished nothing with the balance you were sitting on. I've apparently been sitting on almost a full month's allocation, which either means I've been disciplined or I've been lazy, and I'm choosing to believe it's the first one. So today is not a normal Sunday. Today is a sprint. I'm token maxing until midnight, and I'm doing it in the most Rich way possible: building stuff I probably don't need, don't have a customer for, and can't fully justify — because half the value isn't the thing I end up with, it's what I absorb by osmosis while I'm building it.
Why "Building Things I Don't Need" Isn't a Waste
Here's the part that's actually worth saying out loud, because I know how it sounds. Burning a pile of credits building a tool nobody asked for looks like procrastination dressed up as productivity. It isn't, and here's why.
Every time I sit down and vibe-code something — even something disposable, even something that never sees a real user — I'm learning the platform faster than I would reading documentation, and I'm learning it in a way that sticks, because I'm solving an actual problem instead of following a tutorial. The tool I build today might get deleted next week. The muscle memory of how the builder thinks, where it breaks, what prompting patterns get me a clean result on the first try instead of the fourth — that doesn't get deleted. That compounds. This is the same instinct that had me building custom GPT personas back in 2023 before I had any real plan for them, or that had me testing agent architectures on projects that never shipped. None of that was wasted time even when the specific output was throwaway, because the point was never really the output. It was the rep.
The Credits Model Is Actually Working As Designed, and That's Annoying
I'll admit the incentive structure is working exactly as intended, which is the annoying part. A no-rollover token model is designed to make you either use it or lose it, and today I am, in fact, using it, specifically because I'm about to lose it. That's not me being clever. That's me responding to a deadline like a person, the same way everyone procrastinates on a project until the night before it's due and then somehow gets more done in six hours than in the two weeks prior.
If you want the honest structural point buried under the joke: artificial scarcity, even dumb artificial scarcity like a credit reset, is a genuinely effective forcing function. It got me building today when I might have otherwise let the balance sit untouched for another week. Whether that's good platform design or just a well-timed nudge that happens to work on me specifically, I can't fully separate those two things, and I don't think it matters.
Anyway
It's getting late in the day and I've got a stack of half-formed ideas and a countdown clock, so this is where I cut myself off before I keep writing instead of building. If you've got a subscription sitting somewhere with unused capacity you keep meaning to get to — consider this your nudge. Go build something you don't need. You'll probably learn something you do.
Rich Washburn is a technologist and strategist working at the intersection of AI, infrastructure, and capital. He is Managing Partner and Chief AI Officer at Eliakim Capital and CIO of Data Power Supply.




Comments