The Great Scrape: How Reddit vs. Perplexity Exposed the Broken Economics of the AI Era
- Rich Washburn
- 3 days ago
- 3 min read
The internet just caught AI in the act — but the crime scene looks more like a mirror.
Reddit set a “honey pot” — a fake post visible only to Google’s crawler. When Perplexity’s AI surfaced that invisible post, it confirmed what many suspected: Perplexity wasn’t just browsing the open web; it was pulling from Google’s cached Reddit content via proxy networks like OxyLabs, WMProxy, and SerpAPI.
In plain English: Reddit built a locked vault, Google indexed the vault, and Perplexity found a side door through Google’s reflection.
Legally, Reddit’s framing this as more than copyright infringement. It’s about breach of access controls and unfair competition — and that’s a much bigger bombshell. Because if Reddit wins, it’s not just Perplexity that’s exposed — it’s every AI company built on the same “scrape first, apologize later” foundation.
The Two-Tier AI Economy
The AI gold rush has quietly divided the internet into two classes:
Tier 1: The Licensed Few Companies like Google and OpenAI are cutting checks to stay legit. Reddit’s deal with Google reportedly lands in the $60–70 million range, accounting for nearly 10% of Reddit’s revenue. These are the official “data diners,” sitting at the VIP table with napkins and contracts.
Tier 2: The Unlicensed Many Then you’ve got the guerrillas — startups like Perplexity — skipping the velvet rope, scraping data through proxies, and calling it “open internet.” The end result’s the same: they’re feeding their models on content they didn’t pay for. The only difference is which door they came in.
It’s like robbing an armored truck instead of a bank vault — same loot, different method.
The Law Can’t Keep Up
Here’s the kicker: copyright law wasn’t built for this world. It’s a relic of a slower, human-readable internet. It defines ownership in terms of works — not patterns or training data.
AI doesn’t copy your post; it learns from it. Once that happens, it’s permanently baked into the model’s neural fabric. There’s no “undo” button. You can’t untrain a mind.
That’s why these lawsuits — from Reddit vs. Perplexity to NYT vs. OpenAI — are mostly retrospective. They can fine the past, but they can’t unteach the future.
The Creator’s Dilemma
And while these platforms posture about “protecting creators,” let’s be honest — this isn’t about defending people. It’s about monetizing them.
When Reddit cashes Google’s check, do the actual Redditors — the ones whose comments, insights, and creativity fuel the platform — see a dime? Of course not. They’re not even in the room.
So creators face two equally bleak options:
Licensing Model: Platforms get paid; creators get crumbs.
Open Internet Model: Everything’s “fair game,” and creators lose all control.Either way, the value chain skips the human at the start of it.
The Collapse of Intellectual Boundaries
We’ve entered an era where copyright law isn’t dying — it’s being outgrown. The real disruption isn’t financial; it’s philosophical.
Ownership, authorship, originality — these were stable concepts when works were discrete and human-made. But now, we’ve built systems that digest billions of online fragments and remix them into new forms of knowledge.
We’ve moved from copyright to context-right — and that’s a territory with no maps, no rules, and no referees.
The Real Question
So, if every major AI model is trained on scraped data, what does “ownership” even mean anymore? Who controls meaning in a world where machines are the ultimate remix artists?
Right now, the answer isn’t moral — it’s mechanical. The line isn’t defined by ethics or law; it’s defined by who can afford the lawyers, the licenses, or the loudest megaphone.
And that’s not a line. That’s a negotiation in progress.
The Reddit–Perplexity case isn’t a scandal. It’s a symptom — proof that the internet’s business model and its moral compass are now out of sync. What used to be called sharing is now training data. What used to be community is now commodity.
Until we rethink the economics of information — who owns it, who trains on it, and who profits from it — these legal showdowns will keep playing out like reruns. Entertaining, yes. Transformative, not yet.
Your Turn
If you’re a creator, technologist, or business leader — this is your wake-up call. Your data is already someone’s training set. Your voice is already part of someone else’s model. The only question left is: what will you do with that reality?
Comments